Some doubts about ARP deception experiment

       Last time I wrote an article , Said something about ARP The experiment of intercepting intranet traffic pictures after cheating . After repeated verification later , It is found that the actual success rate is very low , And it doesn't seem to work very well for the mobile terminal . This makes me wonder , So today, I will focus on drifnet A little exploration .

       The exploration found the following points ：

       1、 In progress arp After cheating , My computer can't capture the picture of my mobile phone , But my mobile phone has actually been arp cheated . When I want to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward write in 0 after , My cell phone is disconnected . This proves that my mobile traffic is indeed through my computer , But my computer can't capture its pictures , And it is worth mentioning that whether it is one-way or two-way arp No deception .

       2、 When all my thoughts are gone , I'm driving drifnet Open a website at will , In an instant, a large number of pictures are drifnet Flashed inside ！ in other words drifnet You can capture pictures , It has a strong reaction to my computer traffic .drifnet You can grab pictures from traffic . There's no doubt about that .

       3、 Once again, what makes me despair is , Even if it's capturing the pictures of my computer , You can just grab http Agreement to visit the website .https Still not .

Think of it more in the future