Haar cascades and LBP cascades in face detection [closed] - Haar cascades vs. LBP cascades in face detection [closed]

problem ：

Closed . close .This question is opinion-based . The question is Opinion based .It is not currently accepting answers. It doesn't accept the answer at present .

---

Want to improve this question? Want to improve this problem ？Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post . Update questions , In order to pass Edit this article Answer questions with facts and quotations .

Closed last year . last year close .

Improve this question Improve the problem

I have been experimenting with face detection in OpenCV (Open Source Computer Vision Library), and found that one could use Haar cascades to detect faces as there are several of them provided with OpenCV. I've been trying to OpenCV（ Open source computer vision library ） Face detection in , Discovery available Haar Cascade to detect faces , because OpenCV Several of these faces are provided .However, I have noticed that there are also several LBP cascades. however , I noticed a few more LBP cascade .After doing some research, I found that LBP stands for Local Binary Patterns, and it can also be used for face detection, according to the OpenCV Face Detection Documentation . After some research , I find LBP Represents the local binary mode , according to OpenCV Face detection documents , It can also be used for people Face detection .

What I would like to know is, which works better? What I want to know is , Which is better ？Which one performs faster, and which one is more accurate? Which performs faster , Which is more accurate ？It seems that LBP performs faster, but I'm not 100% sure about that either. look LBP Is faster to execute , But neither am I 100% determine .Thanks. thank you .

---

Solution ：

Reference resources ： https://stackoom.com/en/question/aszC