Comparison of towe/ JIRA / tapd / Zen collaboration platforms

One 、 Platform is introduced

Tower： A project solving tool developed by a company in Chengdu , And abroad 37signals Of basecamp It's like

Jira： Old brand project management tools , It is widely used in defect tracking 、 Customer service 、 Demand collection 、 Process approval 、 Task tracking 、 Work areas such as project tracking and agile management

Tapd： Tencent self research , In addition to routine project requirements management , Provide online documentation , Excellent tool solutions such as continuous delivery ( Introduction to Professional Edition ：https://file.tapd.cn/official/preview/1120003271001000068)

ZenTao ： Domestic software , Product management 、 project management 、 Quality management 、 Document management 、 Organization management and affairs management in one , It is a project management software with complete functions , Perfectly covering the core process of project management （ Installation method ：https://www.zentao.net/book/zentaopmshelp/40.html）

Two 、 Scale of use

Tower： Suitable for small and medium-sized teams and project scale

Jira： Suitable for large and medium-sized teams and projects , There is no limit to the number of people

Tapd： Very agile , There is no limit to the number of participants in different projects

ZenTao ： Suitable for large and medium-sized teams and projects , There is no limit to the number of people

3、 ... and 、 location

Tower： Focus on the completion of individual projects , Each requirement can specify one person , Complex functions and processes cannot be completed ,

Jira： A variety of configurations , Various reports , Different departments have different needs to build , The function is very complex , Typical engineer thinking

Tapd： By default, all are designed according to agile thinking , demand 、 defects 、 Iteration, etc , It can be used perfectly with almost no configuration , Product manager thinking

ZenTao ： The biggest feature is the creative integration of products 、 project 、 Test the three concepts clearly separate , Cooperate with each other , And they restrict each other , Through demand 、 Mission 、bug To interact with each other , Finally through the project to get qualified products .

Four 、 cost

Tower

Free version ： Support 10 People here
premium ：21.9/ people / month Annual payment （ It is applicable to daily business and team cooperation ）
pro ：29.9/ people / month Annual payment （ Applicable to comprehensive project management ）

Jira

Different functions and support charges vary , Summarize by checked service
The more people there are, the higher the charge
Built in application mall , Third party applications need to be purchased separately

Such as （ dollar ）：

Tapd

The standard version ： Free trial , Less function , No defect management function
pro ： Free trial , Moderate function , There are no test cases 、 Test plan and other functions
Enterprise Edition ： Fee unknown , A certain number of people need to be planned 、 Use the time to apply , It's usually 6 You can apply after months

ZenTao

Open source Edition ： Completely free , It can meet the needs of most enterprises , contain bug management

pro ：12000/1 year ,28800/ For life , There is no limit to the number of people , In addition to the open source version, it also includes ：app/ SMS notification 、 Custom report 、 Code management, etc

Enterprise Edition ： Fee unknown , There is no limit to the number of people , In addition to the professional edition features, it also includes ： Mocha ITOM 、 Attendance office 、 Document management 、 Custom workflow

5、 ... and 、 Functional comparison

Tower： Kanban , project management

Jira： Very powerful , There are few unexpected functions , Even code management and flow chart design are integrated

Tapd： Powerful , No customization required , It can be used directly , All the functions that the project needs to use involve

ZenTao ： Powerful , Support open source local deployment , Support saas edition , Function as follows ：

Product management ： product 、 demand 、 plan 、 Release 、 Road map and other functions .
project management ： project 、 Mission 、 The team 、build、 Burn out chart and other functions .
Quality management ：bug、 The test case 、 Test task 、 Test results and other functions .
Document management ： Product document library 、 Project document library 、 Custom document library and other functions .
Business management ：todo management , My mission 、 my Bug、 My needs 、 My project and other personal affairs management functions .
Organizational management ： department 、 user 、 grouping 、 Authority and other functions .
Statistical function ： Rich statistical tables .
Search function ： Search to find the corresponding data

summary

Tower

advantage ： It's easy to operate , Easy push , Fast opening speed in China

shortcoming ： Less function , Some complex processes 、 Multi person maintenance module 、 Tests, products and so on can not meet the requirements for use

Jira

advantage ： It covers almost all conceivable functions , With mobile end （IOS\ Android ）

shortcoming ： Domestic open card , It doesn't accord with the logic of Chinese people , The use threshold is very high （ It's extremely complex ）, The cost is high

Tapd

advantage ： Document management is very convenient ,wiki Natural support Markdown Format , For test cases 、 coordination Jenkins Can do automated publishing

shortcoming ： Need to be reviewed , Unfriendly to companies with sensitive business

ZenTao

advantage ： Zen is open source and free , No charge from download to use . The function is very complete , Extensibility , And the code is open for secondary development

shortcoming ： Zen interface design is slightly inferior , It's not simple enough , The use of color is also relatively simple , There are still some problems for some newcomers in operation