Opengauss active / standby architecture works with keeplive

opengauss The active and standby architectures cooperate keeplive Is there any risk in using ？

explain ：opengauss The active and standby architectures cooperate keeplive Use is mainly to consider the use of domain names （keeplive fictitious IP Domain name of ） There is no need to modify the application connection string during connection switching

opengauss Is there a better architecture than this in the use scenario ？

---

Take the answer 1：

Better architecture , Use the enterprise version , such as MogDB.

openGauss It's a stand-alone version , For active and standby architecture Keepalived perhaps pacemaker Fine , There is not much risk , Both are mature middleware .

---

Other answers 1：

Better architecture , Use the enterprise version , such as MogDB.

openGauss It's a stand-alone version , For active and standby architecture Keepalived perhaps pacemaker Fine , There is not much risk , Both are mature middleware .