[shared farm] smart agriculture applet, customized development and secondary development of Kaiyuan source code, which is more appropriate?

If you want to talk about custom development or secondary development of source code, which is more appropriate , First of all, we have to figure out the difference between the two smart agricultural applets ？ If you want to completely customize the development of a small program, the cost is basically in 5-8W. And it takes a long time . Many people are willing to bear the cost of capital , Also unwilling to bear the cost of time . Therefore, the secondary development mode with complete finished product template has become the first choice .

    that , What are the advantages of secondary development of finished products ？

First , The cost is less than that of customized development , Maybe less than half of the custom development . Secondly , The development time is also relatively fast , Even faster, it can be put into operation in a few days . Last , More importantly , If it is secondary development , Then the technical scheme is mature . This includes , Combination of software and hardware , Hardware procurement , Construction, etc , Others have a plan to learn from , Can walk a lot of detours less . The above is the advantage of the secondary development of smart agricultural finished product applet .

that , Is secondary development particularly good ？ No, it isn't ; Custom development takes a long time , high price , But it can be done according to your needs , The program is more suitable for your requirements .

   So , Custom development of smart agriculture applet or secondary development of source code , There is no certain difference between good and bad , It mainly depends on whether it is appropriate , It depends on the specific situation .