当前位置:网站首页>From the perspective of the core competitiveness of ABT, the Internet giant, who fell first

From the perspective of the core competitiveness of ABT, the Internet giant, who fell first

2022-06-25 18:36:00 ookaoooo

As 80 After a generation , Especially in China 80 after , We have witnessed the fastest development and change of the country , Li has also witnessed numerous century old enterprises around the world , The decline of top 100 enterprises , We have witnessed that some small enterprises have become big enterprises that can affect the world . For example, if you contact the computer earlier . To Sina 、 sohu 、 Shanda used to be the first echelon , It must not be strange , Nowadays, these top Internet companies in China have become 00 Enterprises that do not know at all . This is related to the rapid development , It is also related to the defects of the enterprise itself ,ABT No exception will be faced with ‘ Time is a butcher's knife ’ The harsh reality , If you don't let yourself change , Will be eliminated by history. This law will never change .

ABT Three giants , According to the current development situation, there is no special situation , Ali was the first to fall . Next is Baidu , Tencent should have the most vitality . Please do not spray , Let me explain why .

Why did Ali fall first , Ali is now facing the embarrassing situation that he has completed his historical task , Ali does not have the low price , The advantage of good quality , Many manufacturers find that the Internet cannot replace offline channels , The network lacks offline channels " Conserve water " The ability of , Unable to share the inventory pressure for the manufacturer , Manufacturers face consumers directly , The service cost is higher than the profit of goods , Offline service resources cannot be used , Offline channels are often not the exclusive channel resources of a manufacturer , Reduced service costs . The network price gradually has only guiding significance , For example, large manufacturers have basically achieved the next price online and offline , And this trend is more and more popularized . In addition, the tax and other dividends of online sales are cancelled , The network integrated sales platform like Alibaba no longer has the price advantage . For the moment, Ali should also have experienced this difficulty , Large manufacturers can survive without Alibaba , Ali, a small shopkeeper, doesn't dare care . Ali's dilemma is : No matter the store is not recognized by consumers , The platform will fall down sooner or later . Too strict control without suppliers , It's the same thing . This is the fundamental reason why the online sales platform is getting worse and worse , The shopkeeper was dissatisfied , Consumers are also dissatisfied . Some people say that Ali still pays , But the field of payment , Ali is becoming more and more passive . On the one hand, it comes from the encirclement and interception of the original financial industry , On the one hand, Tencent, a giant that masters social media, competes . I can choose to pay , But social media has no choice . friend , When all partners use a certain platform to collect money , Will force the payer to change the payment channel . After all, currency liquidity is the most important . Let's talk about Alibaba cloud and other businesses , None of them are unique to Alibaba . Ali has not found a breakthrough yet , If Ali can't find this opportunity or breakthrough , Or be occupied by the opponent first , Ali will decline . At most, there is no choice but to have a thin camel bigger than a horse . And gradually withdraw from the historical stage like the former Internet giants .

The second reason is Baidu , For the moment , The foundation of Baidu's decline does not exist , Or not yet , But from the transformation ability of the company , In terms of the profitability of the core competitiveness , Baidu's viability is lower than Tencent , Under the search engine , Baidu has a dominant position in China , What if people don't need search engines anymore ? And all along , Baidu has not changed enough , I have done too little to challenge myself . That is, Baidu's progress is not enough , Just keep raising the building , But there is no such thing as opening up new territory and building a new building , The conclusion is that the innovation ability cannot be improved , It's dangerous . I like Baidu , But objective analysis must put it in the second place .

Why does Tencent have the strongest viability , It's not that he has unshakable social media , There is nothing untouchable about the Internet . Tencent's core profit model , Social boss , Game boss , Competitive boss , End game boss . Are these important , None of this matters ! What is Tencent's starting point ? yes QQ, Now who put QQ It's dead ? Tencent itself , The social overlord is still Tencent . It's like the ability to evolve . Alibaba first has Taobao , Evolved tmall , Ali suddenly lost his way , I don't want to make my own revolution , As a result, Taobao didn't do well , Tmall also lacks innovation ability , Can not change the original mechanism of Taobao , Even better than Taobao , This kind of daring to innovate and present itself incisively and vividly . Which of the three giants has broken its core competence , To death , Rebuild the successful evolution ? At present, only Tencent . Innovation ability , Self evolution , In order to maintain an enterprise's ability to occupy a certain field , Rather than boasting of being the first in the industry 、 Industry overlord . Be able to die your previous model , And continue to dominate the original industry . This generational evolution capability will make the enterprise invincible , Others can only keep chasing .

原网站

版权声明
本文为[ookaoooo]所创,转载请带上原文链接,感谢
https://yzsam.com/2022/02/202202190529472394.html