Look into Palanteer and get an omniscient view of your program
Palanteer is a set of lean and efficient tools to improve the quality of software, for C++ and Python programs.
Simple code instrumentation, mostly automatic in Python, delivers powerful features:
- Collection of meaningful atomic events on timings, memory, locks wait and usage, context switches, data values..
- Efficient logging with a printf-compatible interface
- Visual and interactive observation of records: hierarchical logs, timeline, plot, histogram, flame graph...
- Remote command call and events observation can be scripted in Python: deep testing has never been simpler
- C++:
- ultralight single-header cross-platform instrumentation library
- printf-like nanosecond logging with level, category and graphable arguments
- compile time selection of groups of instrumentation
- compile-time hashing of static strings to minimize their cost
- compile-time striping of all instrumentation static strings
- enhanced assertions, stack trace dump...
- automatic code instrumentation (Linux GCC only)
- Python:
- Automatic instrumentation of functions enter/leave, memory allocations, raised exceptions, garbage collection runs
- Seamless support of multithreading, asyncio/gevent
Recording simultaneously up to 8 streams (i.e., from different processes) is supported.
Palanteer is an efficient, lean and comprehensive solution for better and enjoyable software development!
C++ instrumentation example
Below is a simple example of a C++ program instrumented with Palanteer and generating 100 000 random integers. The range can be remotely configured with a user-defined CLI.
The Python scripting module can control this program, in particular:
- call the setBoundsCliHandler to change the configuration
- temporarily stop the program at the freeze point
- see all "random data" values and the timing of the scope event "Generate some random values"
See C++ example code
// File: example.cpp
// On Linux, build with: g++ -DUSE_PL=1 -I <palanteer C++ instrumentation folder> example.cpp -lpthread -o example
#include <stdlib.h> // For "rand"
#define PL_IMPLEMENTATION 1 // The instrumentation library shall be "implemented" once
#include "palanteer.h"
int globalMinValue = 0, globalMaxValue = 10;
// Handler (=user implementation) of the example CLI, which sets the range
void setBoundsCliHandler(plCliIo& cio) // 'cio' is a communication helper passed to each C++ CLI handler
{
int minValue = cio.getParamInt(0); // Get the 2 CLI parameters as integers (as declared)
int maxValue = cio.getParamInt(1);
if(minValue>maxValue) { // Case where the CLI execution fails. The text answer contains some information about it
cio.setErrorState("Minimum value (%d) shall be lower than the maximum value (%d)", minValue, maxValue);
return;
}
// Modify the state of the program. No care about thread-safety here, to keep the example simple
globalMinValue = minValue;
globalMaxValue = maxValue;
// CLI execution was successful (because no call to cio.setErrorState())
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
plInitAndStart("example"); // Start the instrumentation, for the program named "example"
plDeclareThread("Main"); // Declare the current thread as "Main" so that it can be identified more easily in the script
plRegisterCli(setBoundsCliHandler, "config:setRange", "min=int max=int", "Sets the value bounds of the random generator"); // Declare our CLI
plFreezePoint(); // Add a freeze point here to be able to configure the program at a controlled moment
plBegin("Generate some random values");
for(int i=0; i<100000; ++i) {
int value = globalMinValue + rand()%(globalMaxValue+1-globalMinValue);
plData("random data", value); // Here are the "useful" values
}
plEnd(""); // Shortcut for plEnd("Generate some random values")
plStopAndUninit(); // Stop and uninitialize the instrumentation
return 0;
}
Some C++ performance figures (see here for more details):
- nanosecond resolution and ~25 nanoseconds cost per event on a standard x64 machine
- up to ~5 millions events per second when recording, bottleneck on the server processing side
- up to ~150 000 events per second when processing the flow through a Python script, bottleneck on the Python script side
Python instrumentation example
Execution of unmodified Python programs can be analyzed directly with a syntax similar to the one of cProfile, as a large part of the instrumentation is automated by default:
- Functions enter/leave
- Interpreter memory allocations
- All raised exceptions
- Garbage collection runs
- Coroutines
In some cases, a manual instrumentation which enhances or replaces the automatic one is desired.
The example below is an equivalent of the C++ code above, but in Python:
See Python manual instrumentation example code
#! /usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import random
from palanteer import *
globalMinValue, globalMaxValue = 0, 10
# Handler (=implementation) of the example CLI, which sets the range
def setBoundsCliHandler(minValue, maxValue): # 2 parameters (both integer) as declared
global globalMinValue, globalMaxValue
if minValue>maxValue: # Case where the CLI execution fails (non null status). The text answer contains some information about it
return 1, "Minimum value (%d) shall be lower than the maximum value (%d)" % (minValue, maxValue)
# Modify the state of the program
globalMinValue, globalMaxValue = minValue, maxValue
# CLI execution was successful (null status)
return 0, ""
def main(argv):
global globalMinValue, globalMaxValue
plInitAndStart("example") # Start the instrumentation
plDeclareThread("Main") # Declare the current thread as "Main", so that it can be identified more easily in the script
plRegisterCli(setBoundsCliHandler, "config:setRange", "min=int max=int", "Sets the value bounds of the random generator") # Declare the CLI
plFreezePoint() # Add a freeze point here to be able to configure the program at a controlled moment
plBegin("Generate some random values")
for i in range(100000):
value = int(globalMinValue + random.random()*(globalMaxValue+1-globalMinValue))
plData("random data", value) # Here are the "useful" values
plEnd("") # Shortcut for plEnd("Generate some random values")
plStopAndUninit() # Stop and uninitialize the instrumentation
# Bootstrap
if __name__ == "__main__":
main(sys.argv)
Scripting example
Both examples above (C++ and Python) can be remotely controlled with a simple Python script.
Typical usages are:
- Tests based on stimulation/configuration with CLI and events observation, as data can also be traced
- Evaluation of the program performance
- Monitoring
- ...
See a scripting example code (Python)
#! /usr/bin/env python3
import sys
import palanteer_scripting as ps
def main(argv):
if len(sys.argv)<2:
print("Error: missing parameters (the program to launch)")
sys.exit(1)
# Initialize the scripting module
ps.initialize_scripting()
# Enable the freeze mode so that we can safely configure the program once stopped on its freeze point
ps.program_set_freeze_mode(True)
# Launch the program under test
ps.process_launch(sys.argv[1], args=sys.argv[2:])
# From here, we are connected to the remote program
# Configure the selection of events to receive
my_selection = ps.EvtSpec(thread="Main", events=["random data"]) # Thread "Main", only the event "random data"
ps.data_configure_events(my_selection)
# Configure the program
status, response = ps.program_cli("config:setRange min=300 max=500")
if status!=0:
print("Error when configuring: %s\nKeeping original settings." % response)
# Disable the freeze mode so that the program resumes its execution
ps.program_set_freeze_mode(False)
# Collect the events as long as the program is alive or we got some events in the last round
qty, sum_values, min_value, max_value, has_worked = 0, 0, 1e9, 0, True
while ps.process_is_running() or has_worked:
has_worked = False
for e in ps.data_collect_events(timeout_sec=1.): # Loop on received events, per batch
has_worked, qty, sum_values, min_value, max_value = True, qty+1, sum_values+e.value, min(min_value, e.value), max(max_value, e.value)
# Display the result of the processed collection of data
print("Quantity: %d\nMinimum : %d\nAverage : %d\nMaximum : %d" % (qty, min_value, sum_values/max(qty,1), max_value))
# Cleaning
ps.process_stop() # Kills the launched process, if still running
ps.uninitialize_scripting() # Uninitialize the scripting module
# Bootstrap
if __name__ == "__main__":
main(sys.argv)
The execution of this last script, with the compile C++ as parameter, gives the following output:
> time ./remoteScript.py example
Quantity: 100000
Minimum : 300
Average : 400
Maximum : 500
./remoteScript.py example 0.62s user 0.02s system 24% cpu 2.587 total
Details can be found here.
Logging
Logs are timestamped printf-like messages that contain a severity level and a category for easier filtering.
Nanosecond efficiency is reached by leveraging compile-time pre-computations and deferring formatting on the viewer side.
Console display can also be enabled dynamically, for easy local debugging.
Example:
plLogDebug("input", "Key '%c' pressed", pressedKeyChar);
plLogInfo("computation result", "The resulting value of the phase %-20s is %g with the code 0x%08x",
phaseStr, floatResult, errorCode);
plLogWarn("phase", "End of a computation");
An internal comparison with the popular spdlog and the performant Nanolog (Standford) shows thatPalanteer:
- is ~50x faster at runtime than
spdlogand only twice slower thanNanolog - is 6x faster for compiling a log call than
spdlogand 10x faster thanNanolog - provides more flexibility on the log selection at compile time, and the possibility to obfuscate all static strings.
- can provide more context around logs, like simultaneous tracing, and a powerful viewer for filtering and visualizing (all log arguments can be graphed)
Documentation
The complete documentation is accessible inside the repository, and online:
- Introduction
- Getting started
- Base concepts
- C++ instrumentation API
- C++ instrumentation configuration
- Python instrumentation API
- Scripting API
- More
OS Support
Viewer and scripting library:
- Linux 64 bits
- Windows 10
Instrumentation libraries:
- Linux 32 or 64 bits (tested on PC and armv7l)
- Windows 10
- Support for virtual threads
Requirements
Palanteer is lean, its full installation requires only usual components:
- a C++14+ compiler (gcc, clang or MSVC) in Windows 10 or Linux 64 bits for the viewer and scripting module
- a C++11+ compiler (tested with gcc, clang and MSVC) 32 or 64 bits for the C++ instrumentation library
- CPython 3.7+
- OpenGL 3.3+
In particular, the C++ single-header instrumentation library requires only C++11 or above.
See here for more details on the requirements per component.
Other dependencies are snapshotted inside this repository, so for information only:
| Dependency name | License type | URL |
|---|---|---|
| Khronos OpenGL API and Extension | MIT | https://www.khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/api/GL |
| Dear ImGui | MIT | https://github.com/ocornut/imgui |
| stb | Public domain | https://github.com/nothings/stb |
| Fonts 'Roboto-Medium.ttf' | Apache License, Version 2.0 | https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Roboto |
| ZStandard | BSD | https://facebook.github.io/zstd |
| Markdeep | BSD | https://casual-effects.com/markdeep |
License
The instrumentation libraries are under the MIT license.
The viewer and the Python scripting module are under the AGPLv3+.
See LICENSE.md for details.
Warning: Beta state
Even if no major bugs are known and special care has been taken to test as many cases as possible, this project is young and in beta state.
Your feedback and raised issues are warmly welcome to improve its quality, especially as it aims at improving software quality...
The state of the "interfaces" is:
- Instrumentation API: stable, no big changes planned
- Client-server protocol: still evolving. The induced constraint is that the servers and instrumentation libraries shall match.
- Record storage: still evolving. The impact of compatibility breaks is that older records cannot be read anymore.
Interface stability and support of older versions is planned when the project is more mature. At the moment, such constraint would clamp down on its evolution.
45 Oct 23, 2022
7 Feb 09, 2022
1 Dec 13, 2021
48 Dec 28, 2022
4 Sep 24, 2021
118 Dec 14, 2022
1 Dec 15, 2021
595 Dec 05, 2022
2 Sep 04, 2022
771 Dec 29, 2022
6 Sep 25, 2022
11 Jun 06, 2022
2 Jul 25, 2022
48 Jan 28, 2021
1.3k Dec 30, 2022
7 Jun 10, 2022
1 Jan 21, 2022
155 Dec 28, 2022
6.3k Jan 02, 2023
8 Feb 27, 2022