disentanglement_lib is an open-source library for research on learning disentangled representations.

Overview

disentanglement_lib

Sample visualization

disentanglement_lib is an open-source library for research on learning disentangled representation. It supports a variety of different models, metrics and data sets:

  • Models: BetaVAE, FactorVAE, BetaTCVAE, DIP-VAE
  • Metrics: BetaVAE score, FactorVAE score, Mutual Information Gap, SAP score, DCI, MCE, IRS, UDR
  • Data sets: dSprites, Color/Noisy/Scream-dSprites, SmallNORB, Cars3D, and Shapes3D
  • It also includes 10'800 pretrained disentanglement models (see below for details).

disentanglement_lib was created by Olivier Bachem and Francesco Locatello at Google Brain Zurich for the large-scale empirical study

Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations. Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer, Mario Lucic, Gunnar Rätsch, Sylvain Gelly, Bernhard Schölkopf, Olivier Bachem. ICML (Best Paper Award), 2019.

The code is tested with Python 3 and is meant to be run on Linux systems (such as a Google Cloud Deep Learning VM). It uses TensorFlow, Scipy, Numpy, Scikit-Learn, TFHub and Gin.

How does it work?

disentanglement_lib consists of several different steps:

  • Model training: Trains a TensorFlow model and saves trained model in a TFHub module.
  • Postprocessing: Takes a trained model, extracts a representation (e.g. by using the mean of the Gaussian encoder) and saves the representation function in a TFHub module.
  • Evaluation: Takes a representation function and computes a disentanglement metric.
  • Visualization: Takes a trained model and visualizes it.

All configuration details and experimental results of the different steps are saved and propagated along the steps (see below for a description). At the end, they can be aggregated in a single JSON file and analyzed with Pandas.

Usage

Installing disentanglement_lib

First, clone this repository with

git clone https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib.git

Then, navigate to the repository (with cd disentanglement_lib) and run

pip install .[tf_gpu]

(or pip install .[tf] for TensorFlow without GPU support). This should install the package and all the required dependencies. To verify that everything works, simply run the test suite with

dlib_tests

Downloading the data sets

To download the data required for training the models, navigate to any folder and run

dlib_download_data

which will install all the required data files (except for Shapes3D which is not publicly released) in the current working directory. For convenience, we recommend to set the environment variable DISENTANGLEMENT_LIB_DATA to this path, for example by adding

export DISENTANGLEMENT_LIB_DATA=
   

   

to your .bashrc file. If you choose not to set the environment variable DISENTANGLEMENT_LIB_DATA, disentanglement_lib will always look for the data in your current folder.

Reproducing prior experiments

To fully train and evaluate one of the 12'600 models in the paper Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations, simply run

dlib_reproduce --model_num=

where should be replaced with a model index between 0 and 12'599 which corresponds to the ID of which model to train. This will take a couple of hours and add a folder output/ which contains the trained model (including checkpoints and TFHub modules), the experimental results (in JSON format) and visualizations (including GIFs). To only print the configuration of that model instead of training, add the flag --only_print.

After having trained several of these models, you can aggregate the results by running the following command (in the same folder)

dlib_aggregate_results

which creates a results.json file with all the aggregated results.

Running different configurations

Internally, disentanglement_lib uses gin to configure hyperparameters and other settings. To train one of the provided models but with different hyperparameters, you need to write a gin config such as examples/model.gin. Then, you may use the following command

dlib_train --gin_config=examples/model.gin --model_dir=
   

   

to train the model where --model_dir specifies where the results should be saved.

To evaluate the newly trained model consistent with the evaluation protocol in the paper Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations, simply run

dlib_reproduce --model_dir=
   
     --output_directory=
    

   

Similarly, you might also want to look at dlib_postprocess and dlib_evaluate if you want to customize how representations are extracted and evaluated.

Starting your own research

disentanglement_lib is easily extendible and can be used to implement new models and metrics related to disentangled representations. To get started, simply go through examples/example.py which shows you how to create your own disentanglement model and metric and how to benchmark them against existing models and metrics.

Pretrained disentanglement_lib modules

Reproducing all the 12'600 models in the study Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations requires a substantial computational effort. To foster further research, disentanglement_lib includes 10'800 pretrained disentanglement_lib modules that correspond to the results of running dlib_reproduce with --model_num= between 0 and 10'799 (the other models correspond to Shapes3D which is not publicly available). Each disentanglement_lib module contains the trained model (in the form of a TFHub module), the extracted representations (also as TFHub modules) and the recorded experimental results such as the different disentanglement scores (in JSON format). This makes it easy to compare new models to the pretrained ones and to compute new disentanglement metrics on the set of pretrained models.

To access the 10'800 pretrained disentanglement_lib modules, you may download individual ones using the following link:

https://storage.googleapis.com/disentanglement_lib/unsupervised_study_v1/.zip

where corresponds to a model index between 0 and 10'799 (example).

Each ZIP file in the bucket corresponds to one run of dlib_reproduce with that model number. To learn more about the used configuration settings, look at the code in disentanglement_lib/config/unsupervised_study_v1/sweep.py or run:

dlib_reproduce --model_num= --only_print

Frequently asked questions

How do I make pretty GIFs of my models?

If you run dlib_reproduce, they are automatically saved to the visualizations subfolder in your output directory. Otherwise, you can use the script dlib_visualize_dataset to generate them or call the function visualize(...) in disentanglement_lib/visualize/visualize_model.py.

How are results and models saved?

After each of the main steps (training/postprocessing/evaluation), an output directory is created. For all steps, there is a results folder which contains all the configuration settings and experimental results up to that step. The gin subfolder contains the operative gin config for each step in the gin format. The json subfolder contains files with the operative gin config and the experimental results of that step but in JSON format. Finally, the aggregate subfolder contains aggregated JSON files where each file contains both the configs and results from all preceding steps.

The training step further saves the TensorFlow checkpoint (in a tf_checkpoint subfolder) and the trained model as a TFHub module (in a tfhub subfolder). Similarly, the postprocessing step saves the representation function as a TFHub module (in a tfhub subfolder). If you run dlib_reproduce, it will create subfolders for all the different substeps that you ran. In particular, it will create an output directory for each metric that you computed.

How do I access the results?

To access the results, first aggregate all the results using dlib_aggregate_results by specifying a glob pattern that captures all the results files. For example, after training a couple of different models with dlib_reproduce, you would specify

dlib_aggregate --output_path=<...>.json \
  --result_file_pattern=<...>/*/metrics/*/*/results/aggregate/evaluation.json

The first * in the glob pattern would capture the different models, the second * different representations and the last * the different metrics. Finally, you may access the aggregated results with:

from disentanglement_lib.utils import aggregate_results
df = aggregate_results.load_aggregated_json_results(output_path)

Where to look in the code?

The following provides a guide to the overall code structure:

(1) Training step:

  • disentanglement_lib/methods/unsupervised: Contains the training protocol (train.py) and all the model functions for training the methods (vae.py). The methods all inherit from the GaussianEncoderModel class.
  • disentanglement_lib/methods/shared: Contains shared architectures, losses, and optimizers used in the different models.

(2) Postprocessing step:

  • disentanglement_lib/postprocess: Contains the postprocessing pipeline (postprocess.py) and the two extraction methods (methods.py).

(3) Evaluation step:

  • disentanglement_lib/evaluation: Contains the evaluation protocol (evaluate.py).

  • disentanglement_lib/evaluation/metrics: Contains implementation of the different disentanglement metrics.

Hyperparameters and configuration files:

  • disentanglement_lib/config/unsupervised_study_v1: Contains the gin configuration files (*.gin) for the different steps as well as the hyperparameter sweep (sweep.py) for the experiments in the paper Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations.

Shared functionality:

  • bin: Scripts to run the different pipelines, visualize the data sets as well as the models and aggregate the results.

  • disentanglement_lib/data/ground_truth: Contains all the scripts used to generate the data. All the datasets (in named_data.py) are instances of the class GroundTruthData}.

  • disentanglement_lib/utils: Contains helper functions to aggregate and save the results of the pipeline as well as the trained models.

  • disentanglement_lib/visualize: Contains visualization functions for the datasets and the trained models.

NeurIPS 2019 Disentanglement Challenge

The library is also used for the NeurIPS 2019 Disentanglement challenge. The challenge consists of three different datasets.

  1. Simplistic rendered images (mpi3d_toy)
  2. Realistic rendered images (mpi3d_realistic): not yet published
  3. Real world images (mpi3d_real): not yet published

Currently, only the simplistic rendered dataset is publicly available and will be automatically downloaded by running the following command.

dlib_download_data

Other datasets will be made available at the later stages of the competition. For more information on the competition kindly visit the competition website. More information about the dataset can be found here or in the arXiv preprint On the Transfer of Inductive Bias from Simulation to the Real World: a New Disentanglement Dataset.

Abstract reasoning experiments

The library also includes the code used for the experiments of the following paper in the disentanglement_lib/evaluation/abstract_reasoning subdirectory:

Are Disentangled Representations Helpful for Abstract Visual Reasoning? Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Francesco Locatello, Jürgen Schmidhuber, Olivier Bachem. NeurIPS, 2019.

The experimental protocol consists of two parts: First, to train the disentanglement models, one may use the the standard replication pipeline (dlib_reproduce), for example via the following command:

dlib_reproduce --model_num= --study=abstract_reasoning_study_v1

where should be replaced with a model index between 0 and 359 which corresponds to the ID of which model to train.

Second, to train the abstract reasoning models, one can use the automatically installed pipeline dlib_reason. To configure the model, copy and modify disentanglement_lib/config/abstract_reasoning_study_v1/stage2/example.gin as needed. Then, use the following command to train and evaluate an abstract reasoning model:

dlib_reason --gin_config= --input_dir= --output_dir=

The results can then be found in the results subdirectory of the output directory.

Fairness experiments

The library also includes the code used for the experiments of the following paper in disentanglement_lib/evaluation/metrics/fairness.py:

On the Fairness of Disentangled Representations Francesco Locatello, Gabriele Abbati, Tom Rainforth, Stefan Bauer, Bernhard Schoelkopf, Olivier Bachem. NeurIPS, 2019.

To train and evaluate all the models, simply use the following command:

dlib_reproduce --model_num= --study=fairness_study_v1

where should be replaced with a model index between 0 and 12'599 which corresponds to the ID of which model to train.

If you only want to reevaluate an already trained model using the evaluation protocol of the paper, you may use the following command:

dlib_reproduce --model_dir=
   
     --output_directory=
     --study=fairness_study_v1

   

UDR experiments

The library also includes the code for the Unsupervised Disentanglement Ranking (UDR) method proposed in the following paper in disentanglement_lib/bin/dlib_udr:

Unsupervised Model Selection for Variational Disentangled Representation Learning Sunny Duan, Loic Matthey, Andre Saraiva, Nicholas Watters, Christopher P. Burgess, Alexander Lerchner, Irina Higgins.

UDR can be applied to newly trained models (e.g. obtained by running dlib_reproduce) or to the existing pretrained models. After the models have been trained, their UDR scores can be computed by running:

dlib_udr --model_dirs=
   
    ,
    
      \
  --output_directory=
     

    
   

The scores will be exported to /results/aggregate/evaluation.json under the model_scores attribute. The scores will be presented in the order of the input model directories.

Weakly-Supervised experiments

The library also includes the code for the weakly-supervised disentanglement methods proposed in the following paper in disentanglement_lib/bin/dlib_reproduce_weakly_supervised:

Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromises Francesco Locatello, Ben Poole, Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf, Olivier Bachem, Michael Tschannen.

dlib_reproduce_weakly_supervised --output_directory= \
   --gin_model_config_dir=
    \
   --gin_model_config_name=
    
      \
   --gin_postprocess_config_glob=
     
       \
   --gin_evaluation_config_glob=
      
        \
   --pipeline_seed=
        
       
      
     
    
  

Semi-Supervised experiments

The library also includes the code for the semi-supervised disentanglement methods proposed in the following paper in disentanglement_lib/bin/dlib_reproduce_semi_supervised:

Disentangling Factors of Variation Using Few Labels Francesco Locatello, Michael Tschannen, Stefan Bauer, Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf, Olivier Bachem.

dlib_reproduce_weakly_supervised --output_directory= \
   --gin_model_config_dir=
    \
   --gin_model_config_name=
    
      \
   --gin_postprocess_config_glob=
     
       \
   --gin_evaluation_config_glob=
      
        \
   --gin_validation_config_glob=
       
         \ --pipeline_seed=
        
          \ --eval_seed=
         
           \ --supervised_seed=
          
            \ --num_labelled_samples=
           
             \ --train_percentage=0.9 \ --labeller_fn="@perfect_labeller" 
           
          
         
        
       
      
     
    
  

Feedback

Please send any feedback to [email protected] and [email protected].

Citation

If you use disentanglement_lib, please consider citing:

@inproceedings{locatello2019challenging,
  title={Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations},
  author={Locatello, Francesco and Bauer, Stefan and Lucic, Mario and Raetsch, Gunnar and Gelly, Sylvain and Sch{\"o}lkopf, Bernhard and Bachem, Olivier},
  booktitle={International Conference on Machine Learning},
  pages={4114--4124},
  year={2019}
}

This is not an officially supported Google product.

Comments
  • Evaluation metric on a reduced latent space

    Evaluation metric on a reduced latent space

    The added code adds a further evaluation metric, that measures the performances in a downstream task on the latent space after having removed the K most informative factors of variation from the latent space.

    cla: yes 
    opened by gabb7 3
  • Requirements.txt

    Requirements.txt

    I'm having trouble installing everything. Using setup.py installs tf2.0, which gives me several errors when I run dlib_tests. Can the authors please share a requirements.txt file / fix the setup.py file?

    opened by samarthbhargav 2
  • Resource issue when evaluating the factor-vae metric

    Resource issue when evaluating the factor-vae metric

    When models are evaluated with factor-vae metric, num_variance_estimate (default 10000) samples are fed to representation_function (https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/master/disentanglement_lib/evaluation/metrics/factor_vae.py#L57). So, users having ready-made NVIDIA GPUs cannot deal with 10000x64x64x3 inputs as a single batch. I tested with GTX TITAN Xp with 12GB memory and Tensorflow 1.13.1. Please modify the code to extract representations with batch_size and concatenate them.

    opened by mjpyeon 2
  • conv_encoder function Differs from Beta-VAE Paper?

    conv_encoder function Differs from Beta-VAE Paper?

    https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/shared/architectures.py#L148-L150

    The Beta-VAE paper states that all the convolutional kernels are of size 4x4. I am not sure if it is intended that the 3rd and 4th convolutional layers in the conv_encoder function reduce these kernel sizes to 2x2?

    https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/shared/architectures.py#L184-L201

    opened by nmichlo 1
  • Potential issue with FactorVAE discriminator loss

    Potential issue with FactorVAE discriminator loss

    Hello,

    I am writing about the discrimnator loss for FactorVAE. Should the two values in discr_loss be negative? It seems like the probs_z[:, 0] is the probability that the sample comes from the joint distribution, but the line that I linked would encourage the values in probs_z[:, 0] to go towards 0 instead of 1.

    opened by psoulos 1
  • Bug: Factor-VAE metric can only be evaluated if representation size equals number of latent factors

    Bug: Factor-VAE metric can only be evaluated if representation size equals number of latent factors

    Hi,

    the latest changes in v1.1 introduced an assertion that prevents Factor-VAE to be evaluated if the number of dimensions of the representation is not equal to the number of latent variables of the dataset:

    https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/e2df8efb56466c83f118577456ce860350225156/disentanglement_lib/evaluation/metrics/factor_vae.py#L130

    I am not 100% sure, but I think the metric should also be computable in the other case.

    Again, this is problematic for the disentanglement challenge. As it ends this Friday, a quick fix would be appreciated :-)

    opened by mseitzer 1
  • Code for evaluation on a downstream task in a reduced latent space

    Code for evaluation on a downstream task in a reduced latent space

    The added features allow for the evaluation of the model on a downstream task in a latent space that is deprived from the K most informative factors of variation with respect to the predictive task.

    cla: yes 
    opened by gabb7 1
  • Integration of Interventional Robustness Score

    Integration of Interventional Robustness Score

    Interventional Robustness Score (IRS) implementation from the following paper: Suter, R., Miladinović, Đ., Bauer, S., & Schölkopf, B. (2018). Interventional Robustness of Deep Latent Variable Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.00007.

    New implementation in Tensorflow off the original code

    cla: yes 
    opened by neitzal 1
  • DCI metric: different length of latent codes

    DCI metric: different length of latent codes

    Dear Google research group:

    Thanks for the great implement, I have a related question.

    In DCI metric, dose the dimention D of code C (in 2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK of the paper) affect the output number? If so, how it affect disentanglement, completeness and informativeness? Can I use this metric to compare two latent codes with different length?

    Thank you very much for your help.

    Best Wishes,

    Alex

    opened by betterze 0
  • Why do animations of the visualized model depend on ground truth data for means?

    Why do animations of the visualized model depend on ground truth data for means?

    It seems that the latent traversal animations depend on the ground truth data means for sampling — why is that? Why not sample latents directly and then use the mean representation (from postprocessing) without relying on ground truth statistics?

    I might not be completely understanding that portion. Thanks!

    https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/master/disentanglement_lib/visualize/visualize_model.py#L120

    opened by sharonzhou 0
  • warning during pip install .[tf_gpu]

    warning during pip install .[tf_gpu]

    I got a error in runningpip install .[tf_gpu]: tensorboard 1.14.0 has requirement setuptools>=41.0.0, but you'll have setuptools 40.8.0 which is incompatible. what should I do?

    opened by I-M-Russell 0
  • confused about 2020ICML-weakly supervised disentanglement

    confused about 2020ICML-weakly supervised disentanglement

    Hi, weakly-supervised disentanglement is a nice work. But I am still confused about some concept. Looking forward to your explanation.

    • in the paper at page 5, you compare the work with prior work. "Our approach critically differs in the sense that S is not known and needs to be estimated for every pair of images." May I ask you about the impletation of S estimation? It seems that I have ignore some crucial details.
    • What is the meaning of Rnd? Is it an abbreviations?
    opened by junkangwu 2
  • Typo in conv_encoder architecture?

    Typo in conv_encoder architecture?

    Thank you so much for making this library!

    I was trying to run baselines using this library's "conv_encoder" architecture for the VAE and noticed that that architecture (including in the publicly available models at, for example, https://storage.googleapis.com/disentanglement_lib/unsupervised_study_v1/0.zip) don't seem to match the architecture described in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.12359.pdf in Table 2 of the appendix.

    In particular, it looks like the last two Conv2D embedding layers have a kernel of 2x2 instead of 4x4.

    I have no idea if it makes any important difference, but my intuition is telling me that 4x4 might make more sense (as shown in the attached pull request), so will probably make that change on my end. I just wanted to reach out and see if you would possibly have time to check my thought process there.

    Thanks so much!

    cla: yes 
    opened by travers-rhodes 2
  • Bug during ScreamDSprites initialization

    Bug during ScreamDSprites initialization

    I have noticed a bug when trying to use ScreamDsprites:

    from disentanglement_lib.data.ground_truth.dsprites import ScreamDSprites
    ScreamDSprites([1,2,3,4,5])
    

    Raises an error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "<input>", line 1, in <module> File "disentanglement_lib/disentanglement_lib/data/ground_truth/dsprites.py", line 183, in __init__ scream.thumbnail((350, 274, 3)) File ".venv/disentanglement_lib/lib/python3.6/site-packages/PIL/Image.py", line 2299, in thumbnail x, y = map(math.floor, size) ValueError: too many values to unpack (expected 2)

    The issue seems to be that thumbnail size is taking a tuple of 3 values instead of 2. I have modified l.182 of dsprites.py from scream.thumbnail((350, 274, 3)) to scream.thumbnail((350, 274)) and this is working properly.

    I am using Pillow 8.0.1, but the thumbnail size was already 2D in Pillow 5.0.0 so this is not a compatibility issue.

    I should add that the bug is also present in cars3D

    opened by bonheml 0
  • Strange score distribution in the paper.

    Strange score distribution in the paper.

    image This is Figure 7 MIG distribution on dSprites. The MIG score should be non-negative, and the scores are low. I analyze the pre-trained models and get the following results. image

    I don't know why they are so different, and the other metrics are different too.

    opened by erow 1
  • Weak Dataset Sampling - Possible Discrepancy Between Implementation and Arxiv Paper?

    Weak Dataset Sampling - Possible Discrepancy Between Implementation and Arxiv Paper?

    I have been examining the implementation of generating the weakly supervised dataset from the paper Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromises, however I think there is a discrepancy between the function simple_dynamics in disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib and what is described in Section 5 from version 3 the Arxiv paper.

    Examined Function

    https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib.py#L41-L57

    Excerpt & Corresponding Code

    The following is an excerpt from the Experimental Setup subsection from Section 5 of the paper Weakly-Supervised Disentanglement Without Compromises, split into sections that I assume should correspond to the above code:

    1. To create data sets with weak supervision from the existing disentanglement data sets, we first sample from the discrete z according to the ground-truth generative model (1)–(2).

      https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib.py#L41-L42

    2. Then, we sample k factors of variation that should not be shared by the two images...

      https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib.py#L44-L49

    3. ... and re-sample those coordinates to obtain z˜. This ensures that each image pair differs in at most k factors of variation.

      https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib.py#L50-L54

    4. For k we consider the range from 1 to d − 1. This last setting corresponds to the case where all but one factor of variation are re-sampled. We study both the case where k is constant across all pairs in the data set and where k is sampled uniformly in the range [d − 1] for every training pair (k = Rnd in the following). Unless specified otherwise, we aggregate the results for all values of k.

    Problem With 2?

    From the above excerpt there seems to be a problem with line: https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib.py#L48-L49

    In particular the expression random_state.choice([1, k_observed]). Instead of keeping k fixed half of the time k will be set to 1.

    I may be misunderstanding things from the excerpt, but to me this seems odd that this is happening.

    Fix?

    Based on this, should lines 48 and 49 not be the following?

    index_list = random_state.choice(z.shape[1], k_observed, replace=False)
    

    Problem With 4?

    Based on the following excerpt it seems as though factors in the sampled pairs should always differ.

    ...We study both the case where k is constant across all pairs in the data set...

    https://github.com/google-research/disentanglement_lib/blob/86a644d4ed35c771560dc3360756363d35477357/disentanglement_lib/methods/weak/train_weak_lib.py#L52-L53

    However, based on lines 52-53 this is not the case. There is a chance for the re-sampled factor to be the same. It is not guaranteed to be different.

    This probability of being the same will only increase if the ground truth dimensionality/size of that factor is small.

    Fix?

    Sampling with the original value for the particular differing z removed from the range.

    Untested possible code for 1 input factor:

    choices = set(range(ground_truth_data.factors_num_values[index])) - {z[0, index]}
    z[0, index] = np.random.choice(choices) 
    
    opened by nmichlo 0
Releases(v1.4)
Owner
Google Research
Google Research
Project repo for the paper SILT: Self-supervised Lighting Transfer Using Implicit Image Decomposition

SILT: Self-supervised Lighting Transfer Using Implicit Image Decomposition (BMVC 2021) Project repo for the paper SILT: Self-supervised Lighting Trans

6 Dec 04, 2022
[WWW 2021] Source code for "Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentation"

GCA Source code for Graph Contrastive Learning with Adaptive Augmentation (WWW 2021) For example, to run GCA-Degree under WikiCS, execute: python trai

Big Data and Multi-modal Computing Group, CRIPAC 97 Jan 07, 2023
RGBD-Net - This repository contains a pytorch lightning implementation for the 3DV 2021 RGBD-Net paper.

[3DV 2021] We propose a new cascaded architecture for novel view synthesis, called RGBD-Net, which consists of two core components: a hierarchical depth regression network and a depth-aware generator

Phong Nguyen Ha 4 May 26, 2022
This is a classifier which basically predicts whether there is a gun law in a state or not, depending on various things like murder rates etc.

Gun-Laws-Classifier This is a classifier which basically predicts whether there is a gun law in a state or not, depending on various things like murde

Awais Saleem 1 Jan 20, 2022
PyGCL: A PyTorch Library for Graph Contrastive Learning

PyGCL is a PyTorch-based open-source Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) library, which features modularized GCL components from published papers, standa

PyGCL 588 Dec 31, 2022
Experimental Python implementation of OpenVINO Inference Engine (very slow, limited functionality). All codes are written in Python. Easy to read and modify.

PyOpenVINO - An Experimental Python Implementation of OpenVINO Inference Engine (minimum-set) Description The PyOpenVINO is a spin-off product from my

Yasunori Shimura 7 Oct 31, 2022
SOTA model in CIFAR10

A PyTorch Implementation of CIFAR Tricks 调研了CIFAR10数据集上各种trick,数据增强,正则化方法,并进行了实现。目前项目告一段落,如果有更好的想法,或者希望一起维护这个项目可以提issue或者在我的主页找到我的联系方式。 0. Requirement

PJDong 58 Dec 21, 2022
PyTorchCV: A PyTorch-Based Framework for Deep Learning in Computer Vision.

PyTorchCV: A PyTorch-Based Framework for Deep Learning in Computer Vision @misc{CV2018, author = {Donny You ( Donny You 40 Sep 14, 2022

HugsVision is a easy to use huggingface wrapper for state-of-the-art computer vision

HugsVision is an open-source and easy to use all-in-one huggingface wrapper for computer vision. The goal is to create a fast, flexible and user-frien

Labrak Yanis 166 Nov 27, 2022
The Pytorch code of "Joint Distribution Matters: Deep Brownian Distance Covariance for Few-Shot Classification", CVPR 2022 (Oral).

DeepBDC for few-shot learning        Introduction In this repo, we provide the implementation of the following paper: "Joint Distribution Matters: Dee

FeiLong 116 Dec 19, 2022
SAMO: Streaming Architecture Mapping Optimisation

SAMO: Streaming Architecture Mapping Optimiser The SAMO framework provides a method of optimising the mapping of a Convolutional Neural Network model

Alexander Montgomerie-Corcoran 20 Dec 10, 2022
CSAC - Collaborative Semantic Aggregation and Calibration for Separated Domain Generalization

CSAC Introduction This repository contains the implementation code for paper: Co

ScottYuan 5 Jul 22, 2022
CondenseNet V2: Sparse Feature Reactivation for Deep Networks

CondenseNetV2 This repository is the official Pytorch implementation for "CondenseNet V2: Sparse Feature Reactivation for Deep Networks" paper by Le Y

Haojun Jiang 74 Dec 12, 2022
PyTorch implementation of CloudWalk's recent work DenseBody

densebody_pytorch PyTorch implementation of CloudWalk's recent paper DenseBody. Note: For most recent updates, please check out the dev branch. Update

Lingbo Yang 401 Nov 19, 2022
Official implementation of Densely connected normalizing flows

Densely connected normalizing flows This repository is the official implementation of NeurIPS 2021 paper Densely connected normalizing flows. Poster a

Matej Grcić 31 Dec 12, 2022
Statistical and Algorithmic Investing Strategies for Everyone

Eiten - Algorithmic Investing Strategies for Everyone Eiten is an open source toolkit by Tradytics that implements various statistical and algorithmic

Tradytics 2.5k Jan 02, 2023
Workshop Materials Delivered on 28/02/2022

intro-to-cnn-p1 Repo for hosting workshop materials delivered on 28/02/2022 Questions you will answer in this workshop Learning Objectives What are co

Beginners Machine Learning 5 Feb 28, 2022
The spiritual successor to knockknock for PyTorch Lightning, get notified when your training ends

Who's there? The spiritual successor to knockknock for PyTorch Lightning, to get a notification when your training is complete or when it crashes duri

twsl 70 Oct 06, 2022
Pytorch implementation for Semantic Segmentation/Scene Parsing on MIT ADE20K dataset

Semantic Segmentation on MIT ADE20K dataset in PyTorch This is a PyTorch implementation of semantic segmentation models on MIT ADE20K scene parsing da

MIT CSAIL Computer Vision 4.5k Jan 08, 2023
Official code for On Path Integration of Grid Cells: Group Representation and Isotropic Scaling (NeurIPS 2021)

On Path Integration of Grid Cells: Group Representation and Isotropic Scaling This repo contains the official implementation for the paper On Path Int

Ruiqi Gao 39 Nov 10, 2022