Implementation of our ECCV 2020 paper The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Instance Segmentation

This repo contains code of Simcal, which won the LVIS 2019 challenge. Note that it can achieve much higher tail class performance by simply change the calibration head from 2-layer fc with random initialization (2fc_rand) to 3-layer fc initialized from original model with standard training (3fc_ft), refer to paper for details. But we did not notice this during the challenge submission and used 2fc_rand, so much higher result of tail clasees on test set is expected with SimCal 3fc_ft.

License

This project is released under the Apache 2.0 license.

TODO

remove and clean redundant and commented codes
update script for installing with pytorch 1.1.0 to have faster calibration training
merge mask r-cnn and htc model test file, add htc calibration code, add Props-GT experiment code

Pull requests to improve the codebase or fix bugs are welcome

Installation

Simcal is based on mmdetection, Please refer to INSTALL.md for installation and dataset preparation.

Or run the following installation script:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
conda create -n simcal_mmdet python=3.7
source ~/anaconda3/etc/profile.d/conda.sh
conda init bash
conda activate simcal_mmdet
echo "python path"
which python
conda install pytorch==1.2.0 torchvision==0.4.0 cudatoolkit=9.2 -c pytorch
pip install cython==0.29.12 mmcv==0.2.16 matplotlib terminaltables
pip install "git+https://github.com/cocodataset/cocoapi.git#subdirectory=PythonAPI"
pip install opencv-python-headless
pip install Pillow==6.1
pip install numpy==1.17.1 --no-deps
git clone https://github.com/twangnh/SimCal
cd SimCal
pip install -v -e .

To also get instance-centric AP results, please do not install official LVIS api or cocoapi with pip, as we have modified it with a local copy in the repository to additionally calculate instance centric bin AP results (i.e., AP1,AP2,AP3,AP4). We may create a pull request to update the official APIs for this purpose later.

Dataset preparation

For LVIS dataset, please arrange the data as:

SimCal
├── configs
├── data
│   ├── LVIS
│   │   ├── lvis_v0.5_train.json.zip
│   │   ├── lvis_v0.5_val.json.zip
│   │   ├── images
│   │   │   ├── train2017
│   │   │   ├── val2017

note for LVIS images, you can just create a softlink for the val2017 to point to COCO val2017

For COCO-LT (our sampled long-tail version of COCO, refer to paper for details), please download the sampled annotation file train_coco2017_LT_sampled.json and put it at data/coco/annotations/

Training (Calibration)

Calibration uses multi-gpu training to perform bi-level proposal sampling, to run calibration on a model, e.g.,

python tools/train.py configs/simcal/calibration/mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_lvis_agnostic.py --use_model 3fc_ft --exp_prefix xxx --gpus 4/8

will use 3fc_ft head as described in the paper and save calibrated head ckpt with exp_prefix

Pre-trained models and calibrated heads

All the calibrated models reported in the paper are released for reproduction and future research:

Model	Link
r50-ag epoch-12	Googledrive
calibrated cls head	Googledrive

Model	Link
r50 epoch-12	Googledrive
calibrated cls head	Googledrive

Model	Link
r50-ag-coco-lt epoch-12	Googledrive
calibrated cls head	Googledrive

Model	Link
htc-x101 epoch-20	Googledrive
calhead-stege0	Googledrive
calhead-stege1	Googledrive
calhead-stege2	Googledrive

To evaluate and reproduce the paper result models, please first download the model checkpoints and arrange them as:

SimCal
├── configs
├── work_dirs
    |-- htc
    |   |-- 3fc_ft_stage0.pth
    |   |-- 3fc_ft_stage1.pth
    |   |-- 3fc_ft_stage2.pth
    |   `-- epoch_20.pth
    |-- mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_cocolt_agnostic
    |   |-- 3fc_ft.pth
    |   `-- epoch_12.pth
    |-- mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_lvis_agnostic
    |   |-- 3fc_ft.pth
    |   `-- epoch_12.pth
    `-- mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_lvis_clswise
        |-- 3fc_ft_epoch.pth
        |-- 3fc_ft.pth
        `-- epoch_12.pth

Test with pretrained models and calibrated heads

mrcnn on lvis, paper result:

Test LVIS r50-ag model (use --eval bbox for box result)

./tools/dist_test.sh configs/simcal/calibration/mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_lvis_agnostic.py 8 --cal_head 3fc_ft --out ./temp.pkl --eval segm

bin 0_10 AP: 0.13286122428874017
bin 10_100 AP: 0.23243947868384135
bin 100_1000 AP: 0.20696891455408
bin 1000_* AP: 0.2615438157753328
bAP 0.20845335832549858
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.222
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50      | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.354
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.75      | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.236
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.154
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.298
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.373
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  r] = 0.182
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  c] = 0.215
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  f] = 0.247
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.315
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.216
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.382
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.453

Test LVIS r50 model (use --eval bbox for box result)

./tools/dist_test.sh configs/simcal/calibration/mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_lvis_clswise.py 8 --cal_head 3fc_ft --out ./temp.pkl --eval segm

bin 0_10 AP: 0.10187003036862649
bin 10_100 AP: 0.23907519508889202
bin 100_1000 AP: 0.22468457541750592
bin 1000_* AP: 0.28687985066050825
bAP 0.21312741288388318
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.234
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50      | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.375
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.75      | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.245
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.167
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.316
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.405
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  r] = 0.164
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  c] = 0.225
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  f] = 0.272
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.331
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.233
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.399
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.481

mrcnn on cocolt, paper result:

Test COCO-LT r50-ag model (use --eval bbox for box result)

./tools/dist_test.sh configs/simcal/calibration/mask_rcnn_r50_fpn_1x_lvis_agnostic.py 8 --cal_head 3fc_ft --out ./temp.pkl --eval segm

 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.246
bin ins nums: [4, 24, 32, 20]
bins ap: [0.1451797625472811, 0.1796142130031695, 0.27337165679657216, 0.3027201541441131]
eAP : 0.22522144662278398
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50      | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.412
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.75      | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.257
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.133
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.278
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.334
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=  1 ] = 0.239
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.424
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.450
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.269
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.481
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.586

htc on lvis, paper result:

Test HTC model (use --eval bbox for box result)

./tools/dist_test_htc.sh configs/simcal/calibration/htc_lvis_31d9.py 8 --out ./temp2.pkl --eval segm

bin 0_10 AP: 0.18796762487467375
bin 10_100 AP: 0.34907335159564473
bin 100_1000 AP: 0.3304618611020927
bin 1000_* AP: 0.3674197862439286
bAP 0.30873065595408494
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.334
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50      | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.490
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.75      | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.357
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.228
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.422
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.565
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  r] = 0.247
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  c] = 0.337
 Average Precision  (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=  f] = 0.364
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=   all | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.428
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     s | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.300
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     m | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.506
 Average Recall     (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=     l | maxDets=300 catIds=all] = 0.631

note testing with LVIS can be significantly slower as max_det is 300 and det confidence threshold is 0.0

Props-GT experiment

By Props-GT experiment, we would like to emphasize that there is still large room of improvement along the direction of improving object proposal classification.

Balanced Group Softmax

We also encourage you to check our following up work Balanced Group Softmax after the LVIS challenge, (accepted by CVPR20 oral). It employs a more specific calibration approach with redesigned the softmax function, the calibration is more effective without dual-head inference, and only calibrates last layer of classification head. Code is available at https://github.com/FishYuLi/BalancedGroupSoftmax

Citation

Please consider to cite our ECCV20 paper:

@article{wang2020devil,
  title={The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Instance Segmentation},
  author={Wang, Tao and Li, Yu and Kang, Bingyi and Li, Junnan and Liew, Junhao and Tang, Sheng and Hoi, Steven and Feng, Jiashi},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.11978},
  year={2020}
}

tech report for LVIS challenge 2019 at ICCV19 (Yu Li and Tao Wang have equal contribution for the LVIS challenge):

@article{wang2019classification,
  title={Classification Calibration for Long-tail Instance Segmentation},
  author={Wang, Tao and Li, Yu and Kang, Bingyi and Li, Junnan and Liew, Jun Hao and Tang, Sheng and Hoi, Steven and Feng, Jiashi},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13081},
  year={2019}
}

Our following work Group Softmax at CVPR20 (oral):

@inproceedings{li2020overcoming,
  title={Overcoming Classifier Imbalance for Long-Tail Object Detection With Balanced Group Softmax},
  author={Li, Yu and Wang, Tao and Kang, Bingyi and Tang, Sheng and Wang, Chunfeng and Li, Jintao and Feng, Jiashi},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},
  pages={10991--11000},
  year={2020}
}

Implementation of ECCV20 paper: the devil is in classification: a simple framework for long-tail object detection and instance segmentation

Related tags

Overview

Implementation of our ECCV 2020 paper The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Instance Segmentation

License

TODO

Installation

Dataset preparation

Training (Calibration)

Pre-trained models and calibrated heads

Test with pretrained models and calibrated heads

Props-GT experiment

Balanced Group Softmax

Citation

Owner

twang

[ICLR 2021 Spotlight Oral] "Undistillable: Making A Nasty Teacher That CANNOT teach students", Haoyu Ma, Tianlong Chen, Ting-Kuei Hu, Chenyu You, Xiaohui Xie, Zhangyang Wang

Code implementing "Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Training"

Video-face-extractor - Video face extractor with Python

Multi-Objective Loss Balancing for Physics-Informed Deep Learning

Official PyTorch repo for JoJoGAN: One Shot Face Stylization

Official implementations of PSENet, PAN and PAN++.

SAT: 2D Semantics Assisted Training for 3D Visual Grounding, ICCV 2021 (Oral)

nanodet_plus,yolov5_v6.0

for taichi voxel-challange event

Source code of the paper "Deep Learning of Latent Variable Models for Industrial Process Monitoring".

Implementation of C-RNN-GAN.

Commonsense Ability Tests

This repository contains code accompanying the paper "An End-to-End Chinese Text Normalization Model based on Rule-Guided Flat-Lattice Transformer"

Using CNN to mimic the driver based on training data from Torcs

SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data

frida工具的缝合怪

Pytorch implementation of winner from VQA Chllange Workshop in CVPR'17

Official pytorch implementation of "Feature Stylization and Domain-aware Contrastive Loss for Domain Generalization" ACMMM 2021 (Oral)

GND-Nets (Graph Neural Diffusion Networks) in TensorFlow.

Employs neural networks to classify images into four categories: ship, automobile, dog or frog