当前位置:网站首页>[Day8 literature extensive reading] space and time in the child's mind: evidence for a cross dimensional symmetry

[Day8 literature extensive reading] space and time in the child's mind: evidence for a cross dimensional symmetry

2022-06-11 22:57:00 Yu Adzuki

Read the literature :

Casasanto, D., et al. (2010). "Space and Time in the Child’s Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry." Cognitive Science 34(3): 387-405.

Links to Literature Space and Time in the Child's Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry - PubMed

This paper is about Day2 Follow up study of literature .

List of articles


The concepts in this article :

A Theory of Magnitude (ATOM): Space 、 Time and quantity are represented by a simulated order of magnitude system in the brain , So the relationship between them is symmetrical .

Theories of metaphorical mental representation(metaphor): Abstract dimensions ( Such as time 、 Number ) Asymmetrically dependent on relatively specific dimensions ( Such as space 、 Move ) To express , Be similar to Day3 In the literature Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT).

Abstract

1、 This study takes children as subjects , Explore the relationship between time and space in developing psychology .

2、 Spatial asymmetry across dimensions at the time of discovery , Space has a greater influence on time , Compared with previous studies in adults (Day2 The literature ) Consistent result .


One 、 Preface

1、 Research questions

What is the relationship between children's space-time perception ? Is it possible for children to ATOM To become an adult metaphor Development ?

2、 Research ideas

Children were asked to perform distance or time distance judgment tasks ( Be similar to Day2 The literature ), May appear 3 In this case :

        (1) Time and space are independent : Time and space judgment tasks have no influence on each other , This is the least likely scenario ;

        (2) The relationship between time and space is symmetrical : The influence of time on space is the same as the reverse , It supports ATOM;

        (3) The relationship between time and space is asymmetric : Space has a greater influence on time , It supports metaphor theory , Consistent with adult results (Day2 The literature ).

The subjects of this study are children whose mother tongue is Greek , In order to avoid children's understanding problems caused by more use of sentences with spatial information to describe time in English context ( Such as long time).


Two 、 Experimental design

99 Subjects participated in 2( Age group ,47 Name low age 4.5-5.9 year /52 Name high age 9.1-10.9 year , Intergroup )×2( Question type , belt / Problems without spatial information [longer/more time], Intergroup )×2( Judgment dimension , Time / Space , Within the group )×2( Type of cross domain interference , Yes / nothing , Within the group ) Hybrid experimental design , Participate in... In turn 3 A mission :

(1)Racing snails (distance-time interference task): Showing two parallel moving snails , Both move 1) Different distances and different times ;2) Different distances at the same time ;3) Same distance, different time , The subjects were asked to compare the distance or duration of their movement .

(2)Static lines (distance judgment control task): The subjects judged which of the two static lines presented at the same time was longer .

(3)Bouncing snails (duration judgment control task)


3、 ... and 、 experimental result

1、 Intra group ANOVA

For the intergroup variable age (2 Group ) And the type of problem (2 Group ) Composed of 4 Each treatment team will conduct 2 Of variables within a group 2×2 ANOVA results in :

(1) The main effect of interference is significant , Without spatiotemporal interference ( Task 2 、 3、 ... and ) The performance of the subjects is better than the interference condition ( Task a );

(2) The main effect of judgment task is significant , The performance of spatial judgment task is better than that of temporal judgment task ;

(3) The interaction between interference and judgment task is significant , The influence of cross dimension interference on temporal judgment is higher than that on spatial judgment .

 2、 Mixed analysis of variance

Effect of distance on time judgments = [(% Correct time judgments without distance interference)  - (% Correct time judgments with distance interference)]

Effect of time on distance judgments = [(% Correct distance judgments without temporal interference) - (% Correct distance judgments with temporal interference)]

(1) The main effect of judgment task is significant , The plan comparison shows that the interference effect of space on time is greater than that of time on space , There is an asymmetric relationship between spatiotemporal interference ;

(2) The main effect of problem type and the interaction between the two are not significant , Spatiotemporal interference asymmetry and age 、 Whether to use the problem with spatial information is irrelevant .

3、 The ceiling effect ceiling effect

(1) Performance is significantly below the perfect level (ceiling) Sample of the trial order t test , It is found that the accuracy of time and space task judgment is still asymmetric , Therefore, the ceiling effect is not the cause of spatiotemporal interference asymmetry .

(2) Further analysis of the subjects whose performance was close to perfection found that : Although the spatiotemporal judgment task matches the judgment ability of the subjects ( Its performance can be almost perfect ), Spatiotemporal interference asymmetry still exists .


Four 、 summary

1、 In children's space-time judgment task , The influence of space interference on time task judgment is greater than that of time interference on space task judgment , And ask questions about whether to use questions with spatial information 、 The age of the subjects 、 The subjects' ability to judge spatiotemporal tasks is irrelevant .

2、 This study is related to Day2 The results of literature on adult subjects are consistent , Spatiotemporal interference is asymmetric , Support metaphor theory , I won't support it ATOM( Theoretical details Day3 The literature ).

3、 In this study, we found that older children and younger children have the same susceptibility to spatiotemporal interference , And Piaget's children's thinking developed to 7-11 There are different views on the reversibility of thinking time in the specific operation stage , The possible reason is that reversibility is not enough to overcome the interference between space and time , This is also an adult ( Thinking develops to the stage of logical operation ) There are also reasons for spatiotemporal interference .

4、( In the guidance, etc ) The role of language in the asymmetric relation of spatiotemporal interference deserves further study .

5、 The symmetrical relationship between the two was found in the macaque's space-time judgment task , It may be due to the ability of psychological metaphor 、 Language is unique to mankind , It plays an important role in the spatiotemporal interference relationship .

A little thought

1、 This article aims at the different cognitive ability between children and adults , The experimental paradigm has been adjusted for children , More vivid 、 Interesting , Simple 、 It works .

2、 The three tasks of this article can be regarded as a whole , Task 1 explores children's perception of space-time when space-time interference exists , Task 2 、 Third, the spatial and temporal perceptual abilities of children were studied separately , One 、 The interference of temporal information on spatial perception is obtained by subtracting two , This design is quite ingenious . 

原网站

版权声明
本文为[Yu Adzuki]所创,转载请带上原文链接,感谢
https://yzsam.com/2022/162/202206112250031316.html