[CSDN Q & A] experience and suggestions

CSDN Question and answer ：

Product function ： Is a dedicated to helping IT Products of technicians , For the purpose of IT Technicians provide a reliable technical Q & a platform , Do all-round technical Q & A .

---

Personal experience ：

product BUG： At present, there is no

Product interaction ： commonly

1.CSDN Lack of timeliness . The questions raised by the questioner are sometimes vague , ready to accept either course , The respondent can't even communicate with the questioner and solve it in time

2. For the questions that have been answered , Questioners often forget to adopt , The respondent needs to check repeatedly to confirm whether his answer is adopted , This has brought great trouble to the respondents .

Suggest ：

1. It is suggested to omit the title when asking questions 10 Word requirements , Directly show the problem itself , This will simplify the problem .

2. Suggest CSDN Q & a push questions with low views , This can increase CSDN The vitality of question and answer .

3. Suggested questions 3 Days later, the system automatically adopts answers with high praise , In this way, the respondent will not have to worry about his answer being rejected .

UI Interface ：

Suggest ： It is suggested to cancel the part in the red box , The reward problem can be moved up , In this way, users can see the reward problem area at a glance , To attract more users to answer .

Experience with ：

CSDN The score bonus in the Q & A area is very good , Stimulate the user's desire to answer , But almost the same people are on the list every week , It increases the difficulty of ordinary users on the list , Did not stimulate the vitality of ordinary users .

Suggest ： You can limit the list , such as After being listed this week, it can be listed again every other week or two , This will increase the number of users in CSDN Answer in the question and answer area , Stimulate energy .

Compare with thinking ：

advantage ：CSDN There is a complete reward and punishment system , Encourage users to give standardized answers , The atmosphere in the answer area is good .

shortcoming ： Some questioners' question labels are not accurate and detailed , It is suggested to directly search the question keywords , Accurately find the questions you are good at answering .

---

Conclusion ： a) Very not recommended b) Not recommended c) commonly d) good , Pretty good e) Very recommended

Personal choice d good , Pretty good

---