By CSDN, torn

One day, in the CSDN station, I found that several of my original articles were directly moved and set as "original" by the other party.I am very angry.I went directly to the reporting process, and then I found that more than one blogger moved it like this, and another blogger also directly moved my original article and set it to "original".

I looked at the articles on both of these blog posts, and they both had ads embedded in them.I feel that their "original" is copy-pasted.So, I started the voluntary "CSDN platform purification ambassador" work.I mark them as "original" articles, and find the original source one by one inside and outside the station.Sure enough, I could easily find the source.

My first reaction was, why are these two bloggers so shameless?You advertise, it's okay, you can understand!If you can't write an article, you have to reprint it. It doesn't matter, you can understand it!However, using other people's articles as "original" directly, pretending to be one's own ability, and then forcibly inserting advertisements.Isn't it a little too rude?

Although, I know them (the two bloggers) and ignore me.But I still try to send them a private message, hoping that they will delete the "original" that is not their own creation.

Sure enough, they didn't reply, they simply moved the robot!

Then, I can only take the road of "rights protection", and I start to send the links of each original and plagiarism to the customer service one by one.The customer service also responded quickly and deleted the article!

But what's the use of that alone?So, I started to apply to block these two bloggers.I thought it would be a permanent ban for such an obvious situation.However, I didn't expect that it would take many times (or I would take the initiative to report) to be blocked in order to be permanently blocked.

At this time, I realized that the responsibility of the platform is the greatest!From the audit to the reporting mechanism, it is urgent to improve.I really don't know how CSDN does the audit?I published an article about the law on the WX official account - [QING said], because I quoted a lot of legal provisions, I was not allowed to set it as original.On C**N, word-for-word copy-paste, easy to pass!

It's all about getting it after the fact. The user finds out that his article has been plagiarized and reports it. Only the bloggers who plagiarize others will be punished accordingly.That is, if it is not found, or if the reader finds it, but doesn't care, then plagiarism can run rampant.

After more than two months of hard work, I finally banned these two bloggers permanently!

Blogger A:

Blogger B:

I don't know if the CSDN platform did it on purpose, or if there was nothing I could do about it!I also do not speculate on whether the CSDN platform has other intentions!

This is the end of the story, do you think?I thought so too, but in the past two days, I found that the CSDN platform has a function of [original protection]. I just thought that CSDN has finally improved!After reading it carefully, I found out that the hand of capital has reached our pocket again.

is a paid feature!Although it is not necessary to pay to open it, it also requires you to pay more energy to create original articles that may be marked as "original" by others at any time, and you do not know.

What's the difference between this and 【HowNet】, you have to pay for your own paper?I check my article for plagiarism and I need to pay first!At this time, I said, "It's really ugly to eat." I don't know if it's a bit too much?

Things like this are neither the beginning nor the end.My heart is really broken by CSDN!

Such a thing is not an exception, but a microcosm of the entire platform.

What's even sadder is that this platform is only a microcosm of the creation platform.

My strength is small, but my desire is great.I hope that the CSDN platform, as well as other platforms, can improve the auditing, and don't break the hearts of the originals!

PS: I don't know if this article will be reviewed (plagiarism can be passed, this one can't be passed, and I can't help it, after all, the rule maker is the platform), and I don't know whether this article will be limited.However, no matter if I will send it, even if the reading volume is only 1 .