Evaluation of 6 red, yellow and black list cameras: who is the safest? Who has good picture quality? From now on, let you no longer step on thunder

I worry about the safety of the elderly and children in my family when I go on a business trip or go out , So many people will start with a camera , But there are too many choices of product types , There are too few red and black list evaluations . Therefore, online sales are the best 、 Most popular with users 6 Smart camera , The price from low to high is 179 Of TP-Link、 Millet platform 2k edition 、259 Little white of A2、259 Of 3607P、269 Huawei puffin Pro、 Fluorite C6WI, It is suggested that you can use it if you buy it later .

Often brand merchants are in the publicity , People will say how clear this camera is 、 How good the picture quality is . What about the quality of a product ？ Use your feelings to see the true chapter . Shown below ： The image quality of Xiaomi and Xiaobai is this 6 The worst of the models .

Then when other cameras detect the human body , There will be push , Then Xiaomi and Xiaobai either don't , Or someone in the family will push crazily when they move . In case someone breaks into the house and steals, I don't know .

and TP-Link Fluorite , First say TP-Link The picture quality is really good , and 360 The same is 400W 2.5K Pixel parameters of , This is it. 6 The one with the highest parameters , however 360 It is slightly better in color .

and TP-Link 's camera , The horizontal and vertical viewing angles are very large , But why ha didn't make the red list ？ That's because the picture is stuck , And the sense of delay in operation is obvious , however 179 The price performance ratio is very high .

TP-Link Compared with fluorite , The image quality of fluorite is definitely on the list of celebrities . The disadvantage is that the angle of movement is slightly smaller than others , When checking the situation at home, it is relatively limited , For example, corner 、 Dead corners cannot be detected .

Huawei's image quality is no better than fluorite , But it's also very good , Especially in the micro environment , Phase comparison TP-Link、 millet 、 Fluorite, etc , Only Huawei is still in color , The disadvantage is that in a completely dark environment , There will be some overexposure of the image quality .360 In the daytime, the image quality is better than other cameras , But the most obvious is in the dark light , It can almost sling several cameras mentioned above , As shown in the figure ：

secondly , This zhiting IPC camera IC1 It looks like a sphere , Baibaipang doesn't look like a ball , Its functions are still very complete , The highest support for pictures 2K Picture quality , Make your monitoring content clear and unambiguous , Especially the tracking effect , It's not bad , Fast reaction speed , There will be no jamming or slow tracking 、 Delay, etc

Secondly, it is relatively good from the perspective of trend , As before, fluorite appeared in the picture of Caton 、 Operation delay, etc , And its monitoring range is also very large , It can rotate vertically 70 degree , And the pan tilt part can rotate horizontally 355 degree 、360 Degree without dead angle picture monitoring .

therefore , Xiaomi and Xiaobai under Xiaomi ecological chain , It can be said that it belongs to the black list ;TP-Link、 Zhiting and fluorite belong to Huang Bang type ; Then Huawei and 360 These two cameras were successfully selected into the red list series , You can rush directly .

The conclusion of the evaluation of these cameras is ：360＞ Huawei ＞TP-Link＞ Fluorite ＞ Zhiting ＞ millet ＞ The small white