IELTS essay writing template

Template to sort out theVince9120老师,逻辑清晰,Helpful for writing hit classmate,And easy to get started using.VinceThe teacher video inBilibili,Students proposed to watch the learning note enough time！

一、Big paragraph composition details and distribution

第一段：开头,大观点
第二段：The first point argument+ Logical way to illustrate
第三段：The second point argument+ Example of the way 叙事、The detailed story
第四段：The third point argument+ Give back to the、欲扬先抑（说自己好、Rejected the other point of view）
第五段：结尾

二、Subject and point of view

1、题目：Foreigners to visit China places of historic interest should pay more costs
2、观点：should pay more
点一Culture、点二Economy、点三Feasibility

三、模版

//开头,大观点
It is hard to deny that The other details（To counter when concessions back）, and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the opinion that The other point of view.However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously.As far as 点一,点二 and 点三 are concerned, I strongly hold that Our point of view.

//The first point argument+ Logical way to illustrate
First and foremost, 点一,as 宏观. To be more specific, 局部;Furthermore, 细节.（Make up reasons things out the part）If As our point of view**,we will not** Realize point… .
（Logical part of the macro、局部、细节,In the explanation deposited）

//The second point argument+ Example of the way 叙事、The detailed story
Moreover, the fact that Point two details indicates that Our point of view.Take the case of 人物,who/which 过程. As a result, 结果.Had it not been for 过程概括,人物 would never 结果总结.

//The third point argument+ Give back to the、欲扬先抑（说自己好、Rejected the other point of view）
Nevertheless, a voice arises that Mentioned in the first paragraph of the other point of view. Ironically, Refute each other's point of view. Therefore,点三.

//结尾
In a nutshell , I maintain that We view summary（It should be noted that some 123） .Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of man continues fallible,different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me.However,I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.

四、宏观、局部、细节

When the logical difference between the three、Use level with example：

五、例文

根据VinceThe teacher curriculum arrangement,I hope you can according to the study
It is hard to deny that historical and cultural sites are the symbols of a nation, and we should encourage visiting to promote our national influence. Such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the opinion that we should not charge foreign visitors more to visit these sites, as higher fees discourage visiting and hinder the influence of our culture. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as culture, economy, and feasibility are concerned, I strongly hold that we ought to have foreign visitors pay more for visiting the sites.
First and foremost, having foreign visitors pay more can help promote national culture, as such an act encourages local citizens to visit the sites. To be more specific, the money charged from foreign visitors can be used to subsidize citizens to visit with cheap or free entry;Furthermore, citizens will not only find a free entry inviting, but be attracted with a stronger sense of cultural belonging due to fewer entry barrier.(Optional filler)If we do not have foreign visitors pay more, we will not only lose a great opportunity in showing national culture to citizens, but one in promoting patriotism as well.
Furthermore, the fact that income generated from historical sites promotes local economy indicates that foreign visitors, who usually are able to afford a higher admission, should be reasonably charged more.Take the case of the well-known Cotta site located in the Terra town, which charges foreign visitors 75% more and uses the extra income on infrastructure such as roads, restaurants, and hotels. As a result, not only the life of local citizens is greatly improved, but such act also creates more jobs in town and attracts more domestic and international visitors with easier access and better facility.Had it not been for the extra income from the site, the Terra town would never have been able to significantly improve the life of its residents and form a virtuous cycle in tourism.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that since historical sites are the symbols of a nation, charging foreign visitors more is not feasible as higher prices discourage visiting and hinder the spread of our national influence. Ironically, site admission is usually a small part of traveling expenses compared with plane tickets and accommodation, and tourists usually travel to a foreign country with a sizeable budget; in addition, tourists travel long and far with the aim of exploring and understanding a new culture, so something as trivial as a few extra dollars on a ticket will not be enough to discourage them. Therefore, charging foreign visitors more is a feasible approach.
In a nutshell, I maintain that foreign visitors should pay more as such policy is feasible to implement, and benefits our national culture and economy. Admittedly, as my favorite quote from James Madison goes, as long as the reason of man continues fallible, different opinions will be formed, and some people may oppose me.However, I believe they will compromise after being exposed to my article.