Remote sensing contribution experience sharing

One 、 The division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Journal section , Picture source Po
JCR Area 1 , The Second District of the Chinese Academy of Sciences , Influencing factors 5.347

Two 、 Submission time experience

Write it at the front ： The direction of contribution is remote sensing image processing

1、3.16 Daily contribution , special column ,pending decision;

notes ：MDPI The following article if pending decision It will be more dangerous if it takes more than two working days .

2、3.16 Japan , Two hours after submission, it will turn to under review;

3、3.31 Japan , The editor emailed that he couldn't find the reviewer , Request recommendation , I was there RS I found some on the official website and sent them （ It doesn't feel very useful ）;

4、4.4 Japan , The editor sent an email saying to find all three reviewers ;

5、4.20 Japan ,major revision overhaul , It is required to return within ten days ;

6、5.5 I'll go back to , Because I was busy at that time and the teacher was quarantined after a business trip , Take a moment , And I didn't fix it very seriously , Lead to the following tragedy （ Being rejected ）;

7、5.13 Japan pending editor decision, This is the last step , Academic editors are in charge of life and death , But I was killed ;

8、5.17 Japan Encourage Resubmission after Revisions Reject and resubmit , The academic editor's opinion is a detailed version of the reviewer's opinion , They told me what had not been changed during the overhaul , How to change , Thank you very much ;

9、5.30 Daily editor urges , Ask about the modification progress , Because the course is too busy to change ;

10、6.14 Daily editor urges , Still unchanged , Because the teacher is too busy ;

11、6.16 I'll go back to , Submitted for approval on the same day , Or the original reviewer ;

12、6.27 Japan major revision overhaul , At that time, my heart was cold , Finally, I found that it was all grammar problems ;

13、7.1 Repair it after polishing on the day , Receive in the afternoon , It should not be shown to the reviewer .

3、 ... and 、 Introduction of review time

The official website says 20 God , Netizens reported that 3-8 Zhou , In fact, netizens are more accurate , Otherwise, it took me three and a half months to resubmit the rejected manuscript , In fact, the official website finally shows that after the re investment 15 Days to receive .（ I have the right to suspect that the editor refused the manuscript because it took too long to find the reviewer ！！ Therefore, rejection reduces the overall time ）

However, the main reason is that I wasted too much time , Too busy studying , Course designs are stacked together .

I read many sharing Posts , Generally, the first trial is within one month , Plus self revision and second instance , Finally, it can be controlled within two months .

Four 、 Experience sharing

1、 Reference format

MDPI It has its own reference format , Many people may not find , You can search MDPI+EndNote; Here's the URL ：

MDPI ACS Journals | Endnote (endnote.com)

There's another way , Search an article , Then find the article that quotes it and MDPI The press. , Just find someone else's quoted copy and paste at the end of the article, hahaha

2、Cover letter Templates

Time

Dr. Edit the name

Editor-in-Chief

Journal name

Dear Editor:

I wish to submit an original research article for publication in Remote Sensing, titled “******” The paper was coauthored by ****

Summary and key points

Furthermore, because the major focus of our study aligns very well with the aims and scope of your esteemed journal (including *****), we believe that this paper will be of great interest to its wide readership.

Please consider, as potential referees, ______.

This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere in part or in entirety and is not under consideration by another journal. We have read and understood your journal’s policies, and we believe that neither the manuscript nor the study violates any of these. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

name

Address

Telephone

3、 Reply to the reviewer's summary

We gratefully thank editor and all reviewers for their time spend making their constructive remarks and useful suggestions, which has significantly raised the quality of the manuscript and has enables us to improve the manuscript. Each suggested revision and comment, brought forward by the reviewers was accurately incorporated and considered. Below the comments of the reviewers are response point by point and the revisions are indicated. And the full text has been revised carefully for another time.