当前位置:网站首页>Pinduoduo lost the lawsuit: "bargain for free" infringed the right to know but did not constitute fraud, and was sentenced to pay 400 yuan

Pinduoduo lost the lawsuit: "bargain for free" infringed the right to know but did not constitute fraud, and was sentenced to pay 400 yuan

2022-07-07 06:32:00 CSDN program life

“ are you there ? Cut me a knife ”, Participated in pinduoduo “ Bargain for free ” Active users , I must be familiar with this sentence . In order to bargain successfully , Many people have even contacted old classmates who haven't chatted for many years .

But in practice , Many users said , Cut to the end is always a knife , It's obviously bad 0.9% 了 , But it is still far from success . Last , Many people not only consume a lot of interpersonal relationships , I can only admit my bad luck 、 Settle a matter by leaving it unsettled .

But in recent days , The official account of Shanghai Changning Court released a first instance judgment of users suing pinduoduo , The court found that pinduoduo constituted an infringement of the right to know , It is decided that pinduoduo will compensate users for their losses 400 element .

“ Bargain for free ” Always poor 0.9%, The lawyer sued pinduoduo for fraud

according to the understanding of , Liu, who sued pinduoduo, is a lawyer in Shanghai ,2021 year 3 month , He clicked on the link of his colleagues to participate in pinduoduo “ Bargain for free ” Activities . I got one at “ Super free card ” after , Lawyer Liu chose a mobile phone to bargain .

period , Lawyer Liu keeps sending links to invite friends to bargain , Pinduoduo keeps jumping out “ Good luck ”、“ Bargain first ” Etc , But the progress bar is still poor 0.9%. In order to succeed in bargaining quickly , Lawyer Liu even spent 9.9 Yuan bought the platform “ Speed up the package ”, But the bargaining page always shows “ Getting it for free is only a percentage difference 00.9”、“ It's been cut off 99.1%” Etc .

 

Lawyer Liu was very disappointed to see this result , Don't give up and choose several other products to try , But after repeatedly inviting friends to bargain , These goods also remain poor 00.9% The interface of . Spent money 、 Troublesome friends still can't cut successfully , Lawyer Liu suspected that pinduoduo's data was untrue , In a fit of anger, he took pinduoduo to court . He believes that pinduoduo is suspected of violating the principle of good faith when providing online services , The use of false data concealment rules constitutes fraud , It has also seriously affected the social atmosphere .

Facing the prosecution of Lawyer Liu , Pinduoduo then 4 The response in August said : In this issue “ Bargain for free ” Real and effective activities , Shared activities 1200 The rest of the goods will participate in , It has been sent out accumulatively 709 Thousands of pieces of .

Later this year 1 month , Lawyer Liu revealed some details of the trial on social media . Fight many parties to argue , Due to the limited percentage digits displayed on the page , So they put a percentage with at least six digits after the decimal point , The omission is shown as 0.9%, The bargaining page shows 0.9% It's actually 0.9996427%.

And pinduoduo's explanation , At that time, there was a heated discussion on the Internet , Netizens have said that it is too outrageous , It's simply insulting the user's IQ . And then , This case has been waiting for the court's hearing schedule , until 7 month 5 The sentence was publicly announced on the th .

Infringement of users' right to know , Pinduoduo lost the lawsuit

Before the court pronounces its judgment publicly , Lawyer Liu once made a notice on Weibo , He said :“ It took more than a year , after 5 In this court session, you can bargain a lot and get the case for free , Finally, the first instance judgment is coming . Tell the truth , In the prosecution , I can't think of it anyway , A small mark is 9.9 Yuan of ordinary civil cases , It takes such a long time to hear . Looking back at the whole litigation process , I have to sigh about the strength of my opponent . Not evidence , This case is only the opinions written by both parties , There are hundreds of pages .”

For this victory , Lawyer Liu wrote on Weibo :“ It is not easy to completely change the mode of a marketing campaign involving hundreds of millions of people , It can't be done overnight ,“ It needs to be done step by step ”. One's thinking is limited , Complete change requires a collective effort .”


Netizens applauded pinduoduo for losing the lawsuit , But some netizens said that the punishment was too small :

  • “ Congratulations on your victory ! I believe someone will come forward in the future ”
  • “ good job , It's also the first step ”
  • “ The focus of such cases is not how much to pay , But its own exemplary value and social guiding role . The platform should be in awe of the law , Do your duty , Respect consumers ​”
  • “ The cost of breaking the law is too low , The cost of safeguarding rights is too high ”

Last , What do you think of this judgment ? Welcome to leave a message ~

Reference link :

1.Sina Visitor System

2.Sina Visitor System

3. Verdict of the first instance of the case of Liu Mou v. Shanghai dream Information Technology Co., Ltd. on network infringement liability dispute


New programmers 001-004》 Fully listed , Welcome to scan the QR code below or click to enter Subscribe now , You can enjoy e-books and exquisite paper books !

原网站

版权声明
本文为[CSDN program life]所创,转载请带上原文链接,感谢
https://yzsam.com/2022/188/202207070153558022.html